Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2019

OR

o  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 000-15006

CELLDEX THERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Perryville III Building, 53 Frontage Road, Suite 220, Hampton, New Jersey 08827

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(908) 200-7500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).  Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o  No x

As of July 31, 2019, 15,018,604 shares of common stock, $.001 par value per share, were outstanding.

Table of Contents

CELLDEX THERAPEUTICS, INC.

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2019

Table of Contents

1

Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Unaudited Financial Statements

CELLDEX THERAPEUTICS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

2

Table of Contents

CELLDEX THERAPEUTICS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

3

Table of Contents

CELLDEX THERAPEUTICS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

4

Table of Contents

CELLDEX THERAPEUTICS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2019

(1)  Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company” or “Celldex”) in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and reflect the operations of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

These interim financial statements do not include all the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for annual financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7, 2019. In the opinion of management, the interim financial statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments necessary to fairly state the Company’s financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. The year-end condensed balance sheet data presented for comparative purposes was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP.

The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for any future interim period or the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019.

At June 30, 2019, the Company had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $81.3 million. The Company has had recurring losses and incurred a loss of $29.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019. Net cash used in operations for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was $24.3 million. The Company believes that the cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at August 7, 2019 will be sufficient to meet estimated working capital requirements and fund planned operations for at least the next twelve months from the date of issuance of these financial statements.

The Board of Directors of the Company approved a one for fifteen reverse stock split of the Company’s outstanding common stock, which was effected on February 8, 2019. All share and per share amounts in the financial statements have been retroactively adjusted for all periods presented to give effect to the reverse stock split, including reclassifying an amount equal to the reduction in par value to additional paid-in capital.

During the next twelve months and beyond, the Company will take further steps to raise additional capital to meet its liquidity needs. These capital raising activities may include, but may not be limited to, one or more of the following: the licensing of drug candidates with existing or new collaborative partners, possible business combinations, issuance of debt, or the issuance of common stock or other securities via private placements or public offerings. While the Company may seek capital through a number of means, there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all, and the Company’s negotiating position in capital-raising efforts may worsen as existing resources are used. There is also no assurance that the Company will be able to enter into further collaborative relationships. Additional equity financings may be dilutive to the Company’s stockholders; debt financing, if available, may involve significant cash payment obligations and covenants that restrict the Company’s ability to operate as a business; and licensing or strategic collaborations may result in royalties or other terms which reduce the Company’s economic potential from products under development. The Company’s ability to continue funding its planned operations into and beyond twelve months from the issuance date is also dependent on the timing and manner of payment of future contingent milestones from the Kolltan acquisition, in the event that the Company achieves the drug candidate milestones related to those payments. The Company, at its option, may decide to pay those milestone payments in cash, shares of its common stock or a combination thereof. If the Company is unable to raise the funds necessary to meet its liquidity needs, it may have to delay or discontinue the development of one or more programs, discontinue or delay ongoing or anticipated clinical trials, license out programs earlier than expected, raise funds at a significant discount or on other unfavorable terms, if at all, or sell all or a part of the Company.

(2) Significant Accounting Policies

The significant accounting policies used in preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 are consistent with those discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, except as it relates to the adoption of new accounting standards during the first six months of 2019 as discussed below.

5

Table of Contents

Newly Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted a new U.S. GAAP accounting standard which requires that all lessees recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases on the balance sheet and disclose qualitative and quantitative information about its leasing arrangements. The new standard was adopted using the modified retrospective transition method, which requires the Company to apply the standard as of the effective date and does not require restatement of prior periods. The Company elected to apply the package of practical expedients, which allowed the Company to not reassess: (i) whether expired or existing contracts contain leases; (ii) lease classification for any expired or existing leases; and (iii) initial direct costs for any existing leases. Adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss or Statement of Cash Flow, however, upon adoption, the Company recorded right-of-use assets of $3.8 million and lease liabilities of $4.7 million on its Consolidated Balance Sheet related to the Company’s operating leases. The difference between the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities recorded upon adoption is due to certain adjustments required to the right-of-use assets for prepaid rent and accrued termination expenses. Refer to Note 5 “Leases” for the Company’s updated lease accounting policy and disclosures.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or other standard setting bodies that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, the Company believes that the impact of recently issued standards that are not yet effective will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

In June 2016, the FASB issued guidance on the Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The guidance requires that credit losses be reported using an expected losses model rather than the incurred losses model that is currently used, and establishes additional disclosures related to credit risks. For available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, the standard now requires allowances to be recorded instead of reducing the amortized cost of the investment. This standard will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2020. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued amendments that modify certain disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The amendments become effective, including interim periods, beginning January 1, 2020. Early adoption, of all the amendments or only the provisions that eliminate or modify the requirements, is permitted. The adoption of this new guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In November 2018, the FASB issued guidance to clarify the interaction between the accounting guidance for collaborative arrangements and revenue from contracts with customers. The amendments become effective, including interim periods, beginning January 1, 2020. Early adoption, including adoption in an interim period, is permitted. This guidance is required to be applied retrospectively as of the date of our adoption of the new revenue standard on January 1, 2018. We are currently evaluating the timing of our adoption and the expected impact this guidance could have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

(3)  Fair Value Measurements

The following tables set forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurements:

6

Table of Contents

The Company’s financial assets consist mainly of money market funds, cash equivalents and marketable securities and are classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy. The Company values its marketable securities utilizing independent pricing services which normally derive security prices from recently reported trades for identical or similar securities, making adjustments based on significant observable transactions. At each balance sheet date, observable market inputs may include trade information, broker or dealer quotes, bids, offers or a combination of these data sources.

The following table reflects the activity for the Company’s contingent consideration liabilities measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs for the six months ended June 30, 2019 (in thousands):

The valuation technique used to measure fair value of the Company’s Level 3 liabilities, which consist of contingent consideration related to the acquisition of Kolltan in 2016, was primarily an income approach. The Company may be required to pay future consideration of up to $127.5 million that is contingent upon the achievement of specified development, regulatory approvals or sales-based milestone events. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the contingent consideration are estimates including probability of success, discount rates and amount of time until the conditions of the milestone payments are met.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company recorded a $1.0 million gain and $0.5 million loss on fair value remeasurement of contingent consideration, respectively, primarily due to changes in discount rates and the passage of time. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company recorded a $7.4 million and $21.0 million gain on fair value remeasurement of contingent consideration, respectively, primarily due to discontinuation of the glembatumumab vedotin (“Glemba”) and CDX-014 programs and updated assumptions for the varlilumab program.

The Company did not have any transfers of assets or liabilities between the fair value measurement classifications during the six months ended June 30, 2019.

7

Table of Contents

(4)  Marketable Securities

The following is a summary of marketable debt securities, classified as available-for-sale:

The Company holds investment-grade marketable securities, and none were in a continuous unrealized loss position for more than twelve months as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. The unrealized losses are attributable to changes in interest rates and the Company does not believe any unrealized losses represent other-than-temporary impairments. Marketable securities include $0.1 million in accrued interest at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

(5) Leases

The Company has operating leases of office, manufacturing and laboratory space, which have remaining lease terms of one to six years and may include one or more options to renew or terminate early.

The Company determines if an arrangement contains a lease at inception. Operating lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at commencement date. Certain adjustments to the right-of-use asset may be required for items such as prepaid or accrued lease payments, initial direct costs paid or incentives received. The Company’s leases do not contain an implicit rate, and therefore the Company uses an estimated incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the lease commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. Options to extend or terminate the lease are reflected in the calculation when it is reasonably certain that the option will be exercised. The Company has elected to account for lease and non-lease components as a single lease component, however non-lease components that are variable, such as common area maintenance and utilities, are generally paid separately from rent based on actual costs incurred and therefore are not included in the right-of-use asset and operating lease liability and are reflected as an expense in the period incurred. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet.

During the first quarter of 2019, the Company amended its Hampton, New Jersey lease to eliminate 16,200 square feet of space and extend the remaining 33,400 square feet of space for an additional five-year term with an early termination option after three years. The Company recorded an additional right-of-use asset and lease liability of $1.4 million during the first quarter of 2019 for the initial 3 years related to the amendment.

Operating lease expense was $0.5 million and $1.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively. Variable lease expense was $0.3 million and $0.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively. Operating cash flows used for operating leases during the six months ended June 30, 2019 was $0.9 million. As of June 30, 2019, the weighted-average remaining lease term was 2 years and the weighted-average discount rate was 11.3%.

8

Table of Contents

Future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable leases as of June 30, 2019 were as follows:

Under the prior lease accounting guidance, operating lease obligations, including estimated variable lease obligations, as of December 31, 2018 were as follows:

(6)  Intangible Assets and Goodwill

Intangible Assets, Net

As a result of the discontinuation of the Glemba program, the Company concluded that the finite-lived intangible asset related to its Amgen Fremont license rights to develop and commercialize Glemba and the indefinite-lived Glemba IPR&D asset were fully impaired and a non-cash impairment charge of $18.7 million was recorded in the first quarter of 2018. Amortization expense related to the finite-lived intangible asset was $0.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, and $0.0 million and $0.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively.

At June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded indefinite-lived intangible assets of $48.7 million. Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of acquired in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) related to the development of CDX-3379, the anti-KIT program (including CDX-0159) and the TAM program. CDX-3379 is in Phase 2 development. The anti-KIT and TAM programs are in preclinical development. As of June 30, 2019, none of the Company’s IPR&D assets had reached technological feasibility nor did any have alternative future uses.

The Company performs an impairment test on IPR&D assets at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that IPR&D assets may be impaired. Due to the nature of IPR&D projects, the Company may experience future delays or failures to obtain regulatory approvals to conduct clinical trials, failures of such clinical trials or other failures to achieve a commercially viable product, and as a result, may recognize further impairment losses in the future.

Goodwill

The Company evaluated goodwill for potential impairment due to the discontinuation of the Glemba program in the first quarter of 2018. The carrying amount of the Company was compared to the Company’s fair value. The Company’s fair value assessment reflected a number of significant management assumptions and estimates including the Company’s probability forecasts for pipeline assets, income taxes, capital expenditures, market premium and changes in working capital requirements. Changes in these assumptions and/or discount rates could materially impact the Company’s conclusions. Through this assessment, it was determined that the carrying amount of the Company exceeded its fair value by over $91.0 million. As such, the full goodwill asset was considered impaired and a charge of $91.0 million was recorded during the first quarter of 2018.

9

Table of Contents

(7) Other Assets

In 2016, the Company entered into a research and collaboration agreement with an undisclosed private company to access novel technologies and paid $3.5 million to support research activities and make an investment in the private company. The Company recorded $1.8 million to other assets related to this investment and $1.7 million was recorded to research and development expense over the term of the research activities. The stock of the private company does not have a readily determinable fair value, and therefore it is measured at cost less impairment, if any. Based on information received in April 2019, it was determined that there was a deterioration of the private company’s financial condition due to a working capital deficiency and an inability to secure additional funding as of March 31, 2019. Therefore, the Company concluded that the investment was impaired, and a non-cash impairment charge of $1.8 million was recorded during the first quarter of 2019.

(8) Other Long-Term Liabilities

Other long-term liabilities include the following:

In November 2015 and December 2014, the Company received approval from the New Jersey Economic Development Authority and agreed to sell New Jersey tax benefits of $9.8 million and $1.9 million to an independent third party for $9.2 million and $1.8 million, respectively. Under the agreement, the Company must maintain a base of operations in New Jersey for five years or the tax benefits must be paid back on a pro-rata basis based on the number of years completed. The Company recognized $0.0 million and $0.2 million in other income related to the sale of these tax benefits during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively, and $0.0 million and $0.4 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively.

10

Table of Contents

(9) Stockholders’ Equity

In May 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (“Cantor”) to allow the Company to issue and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $60.0 million from time to time through Cantor, acting as agent. In November 2017, the Company filed a prospectus supplement registering the offer and sale of shares of common stock of up to an additional $75.0 million under the agreement with Cantor. During the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company issued 2,856,194 shares of common stock under this controlled equity offering sales agreement with Cantor resulting in net proceeds of $11.4 million after deducting commission and offering expenses. At June 30, 2019, the Company had $25.8 million remaining in aggregate gross offering price available under the Cantor agreement. In July 2019, the Company issued 201,687 shares of its common stock resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $0.5 million.

The changes in Stockholders’ Equity during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 are summarized below:

11

Table of Contents

(10)  Stock-Based Compensation

A summary of stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2019 is as follows:

The weighted average grant-date fair value of stock options granted during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 was $2.09. Stock-based compensation expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was recorded as follows:

12

Table of Contents

The fair values of employee and director stock options granted during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

(11) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income, which is reported as a component of stockholders’ equity, for the six months ended June 30, 2019 are summarized below:

No amounts were reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income during the six months ended June 30, 2019.

(12)  Revenue

Product Development and Licensing Revenue

The Company’s primary product development and licensing revenue is associated with a clinical collaboration agreement with BMS entered into in 2014 to evaluate the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of varlilumab and Opdivo®, BMS’s PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, in a Phase 1/2 study. Under this agreement, BMS made an upfront payment to Celldex of $5.0 million and provides funding for 50% of the external costs incurred by the Company in connection with the clinical trial. The Company recorded $0.1 million and $0.2 million in revenue related to this agreement during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively, and $1.7 million and $2.6 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively.

Contract and Grants Revenue

The Company has entered into agreements with Rockefeller University and Duke University pursuant to which the Company performs manufacturing and research and development services on a time-and-materials basis. The Company recognized $0.4 million and $1.5 million in revenue for labor hours and direct costs incurred under these agreements during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively, and $0.7 million and $1.4 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively.

The Company has entered into fixed-fee manufacturing and research and development arrangements with the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative and Frontier Biotechnologies, Inc. The Company recognized $0.1 million and $0.2 million in revenue under these agreements during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively, and $0.4 million and $2.7 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively.

Contract Assets and Liabilities

At December 31, 2018 and June 30, 2019, the Company’s right to consideration under all contracts was considered unconditional, and as such, there were no recorded contract assets. At December 31, 2018 and June 30, 2019, the Company had $1.6 million and $0.5 million in contract liabilities recorded, respectively. Revenue recognized from contract liabilities as of December 31, 2018 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 was $0.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively.

(13)  Income Taxes

The Company has evaluated the positive and negative evidence bearing upon the realizability of its net deferred tax assets and considered its history of losses, ultimately concluding that it is “more likely than not” that the Company will not recognize the benefits of federal, state and foreign deferred tax assets and, as such, has maintained a full valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

13

Table of Contents

The net deferred tax liability of $3.0 million at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 relates to the temporary differences associated with the IPR&D intangible assets acquired in previous business combinations and is not deductible for tax purposes. As a result of the discontinuation of the Glemba program, the Company recorded a $0.8 million non-cash income tax benefit during the first quarter of 2018.

Massachusetts, New Jersey, Connecticut and Australia are the jurisdictions in which the Company primarily operates or has operated and has income tax nexus. The Company is not currently under examination by these or any other jurisdictions for any tax year.

(14)  Net Loss Per Share

Basic net loss per common share is based upon the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding restricted stock that has been issued but is not yet vested. Diluted net loss per common share is based upon the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus additional weighted-average potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period when the effect is dilutive. The potentially dilutive common shares that have not been included in the net loss per common share calculations because the effect would have been anti-dilutive are as follows:

14

Table of Contents

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995:  This report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 under Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, assumptions, estimates, intentions and future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may be beyond our control, and which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be forward-looking statements. You can identify these forward-looking statements through our use of words such as “may,” “will,” “can,” “anticipate,” “assume,” “should,” “indicate,” “would,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “expect,” “seek,” “estimate,” “continue,” “plan,” “point to,” “project,” “predict,” “could,” “intend,” “target,” “potential” and other similar words and expressions of the future.

There are a number of important factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by us. These factors include, but are not limited to:

·                  our dependence on product candidates, which are still in an early development stage;

·                  our ability to successfully complete research and further development, including animal, preclinical and clinical studies, and, if we obtain regulatory approval, commercialization of our drug candidates and the growth of the markets for those drug candidates;

·                  our ability to raise sufficient capital to fund our animal, preclinical and clinical studies and to meet our liquidity needs, on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If we are unable to raise the funds necessary to meet our liquidity needs, we may have to delay or discontinue the development of one or more programs, discontinue or delay ongoing or anticipated clinical trials, license out programs earlier than expected, raise funds at significant discount or on other unfavorable terms, if at all, or sell all or part of our business;

·                  our anticipated timing for preclinical development, regulatory submissions, commencement and completion of clinical trials and product approvals;

·                  our ability to negotiate strategic partnerships, where appropriate, for our drug candidates;

·                  our ability to manage multiple clinical trials for a variety of drug candidates at different stages of development;

·                  the cost, timing, scope and results of ongoing preclinical and clinical testing;

·                  our expectations of the attributes of our product and development candidates, including pharmaceutical properties, efficacy, safety and dosing regimens;

·                  the cost, timing and uncertainty of obtaining regulatory approvals for our drug candidates;

·                  the availability, cost, delivery and quality of clinical management services provided by our clinical research organization partners;

·                  the availability, cost, delivery and quality of clinical and commercial-grade materials produced by our own manufacturing facility or supplied by contract manufacturers, suppliers and partners;

·                  our ability to develop and commercialize products before competitors that are superior to the alternatives developed by such competitors;

·                  our ability to develop technological capabilities, including identification of novel and clinically important targets, exploiting our existing technology platforms to develop new drug candidates and expand our focus to broader markets for our existing targeted immunotherapeutics;

·                  our ability to realize the anticipated benefits from the acquisition of Kolltan;

15

Table of Contents

·                  our ability to protect our intellectual property rights, including the ability to successfully defend patent oppositions filed against a European patent related to technology we use in varlilumab, and our ability to avoid intellectual property litigation, which can be costly and divert management time and attention;

·                  our ability to develop and commercialize products without infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties; and

·                  the risk factors set forth elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and the factors listed under the headings “Business,” “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 and other reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary notice. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report or the date of the document incorporated by reference into this report. We have no obligation, and expressly disclaim any obligation, to update, revise or correct any of the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. We have expressed our expectations, beliefs and projections in good faith, and we believe they have a reasonable basis. However, we cannot assure you that our expectations, beliefs or projections will result or be achieved or accomplished.

OVERVIEW

We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of immunotherapies and other targeted biologics. Our drug candidates are derived from a broad set of complementary technologies which have the ability to engage the human immune system and/or directly inhibit tumors to treat specific types of cancer or other diseases. They are aimed at addressing market opportunities for which we believe current therapies are inadequate or non-existent.

We are focusing our efforts and resources on the continued research and development of:

·                  CDX-1140, an agonist monoclonal antibody targeted to CD40, a key activator of immune response, currently being studied as a single-agent and in combination with CDX-301, a dendritic cell growth factor, in a Phase 1 dose-escalation study in multiple types of solid tumors and B cell lymphomas. In addition, we are evaluating the potential combination of CDX-1140 with varlilumab, an immune modulating antibody designed to target CD27 and enhance a patient’s immune response, especially in lymphomas which co-express CD40 and CD27 receptors;

·                  CDX-3379, a monoclonal antibody designed to block the activity of ErbB3 (HER3), currently in an early Phase 2 study in advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer in combination with Erbitux®; and,

·                  CDX-0159, a monoclonal antibody that specifically binds the KIT receptor, potently inhibits its activity and is expected to enter a Phase 1 study in healthy subjects by year end.

We routinely work with external parties to collaboratively advance our drug candidates. In addition to Celldex-led studies, we also have an Investigator Initiated Research (IIR) program with multiple studies ongoing with our drug candidates.

Our goal is to build a fully integrated, commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company that develops important therapies for patients with unmet medical needs. We believe our program assets provide us with the strategic options to either retain full economic rights to our innovative therapies or seek favorable economic terms through advantageous commercial partnerships. This approach allows us to maximize the overall value of our technology and product portfolio while best ensuring the expeditious development of each individual product. Currently, all programs are fully owned by Celldex.

The expenditures that will be necessary to execute our business plan are subject to numerous uncertainties. Completion of clinical trials may take several years or more, and the length of time generally varies substantially according to the type, complexity, novelty and intended use of a drug candidate. It is not unusual for the clinical development of these types of drug candidates to each take five years or more, and for total development costs to exceed $100 million for each drug candidate. We estimate that clinical trials of the type we generally conduct are typically completed over the following timelines:

16

Table of Contents

The duration and the cost of clinical trials may vary significantly over the life of a project as a result of differences arising during the clinical trial protocol, including, among others, the following:

·                  the number of patients that ultimately participate in the trial;

·                  the duration of patient follow-up that seems appropriate in view of results;

·                  the number of clinical sites included in the trials;

·                  the length of time required to enroll suitable patient subjects; and

·                  the efficacy and safety profile of the drug candidate.

We test potential drug candidates in numerous preclinical studies for safety, toxicology and immunogenicity. We may then conduct multiple clinical trials for each drug candidate. As we obtain results from trials, we may elect to discontinue or delay clinical trials for certain drug candidates in order to focus our resources on more promising drug candidates.

An element of our business strategy is to pursue the discovery, research and development of a broad portfolio of drug candidates. This is intended to allow us to diversify the risks associated with our research and development expenditures. To the extent we are unable to maintain a broad range of drug candidates, our dependence on the success of one or a few drug candidates increases.

Regulatory approval is required before we can market our drug candidates as therapeutic products. In order to proceed to subsequent clinical trial stages and to ultimately achieve regulatory approval, the regulatory agency must conclude that our clinical data demonstrate that our product candidates are safe and effective. Historically, the results from preclinical testing and early clinical trials (through Phase 2) have often not been predictive of results obtained in later clinical trials. A number of new drugs and biologics have shown promising results in early clinical trials but subsequently failed to establish sufficient safety and efficacy data to obtain necessary regulatory approvals.

Furthermore, our business strategy includes the option of entering into collaborative arrangements with third parties to complete the development and commercialization of our drug candidates. In the event that third parties take over the clinical trial process for one of our drug candidates, the estimated completion date would largely be under control of that third party rather than us. We cannot forecast with any degree of certainty which proprietary products, if any, will be subject to future collaborative arrangements, in whole or in part, and how such arrangements would affect our development plan or capital requirements. Our programs may also benefit from subsidies, grants, contracts or government or agency-sponsored studies that could reduce our development costs.

As a result of the uncertainties discussed above, among others, it is difficult to accurately estimate the duration and completion costs of our research and development projects or when, if ever, and to what extent we will receive cash inflows from the commercialization and sale of a product. Our inability to complete our research and development projects in a timely manner or our failure to enter into collaborative agreements, when appropriate, could significantly increase our capital requirements and could adversely impact our liquidity. These uncertainties could force us to seek additional, external sources of financing from time to time in order to continue with our business strategy. Our inability to raise additional capital, or to do so on terms reasonably acceptable to us, would jeopardize the future success of our business.

17

Table of Contents

During the past five years through December 31, 2018, we incurred an aggregate of $469.9 million in research and development expenses. The following table indicates the amount incurred for each of our significant research programs and for other identified research and development activities during the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018. The amounts disclosed in the following table reflect direct research and development costs, license fees associated with the underlying technology and an allocation of indirect research and development costs to each program.

Clinical Development Programs

CDX-1140

CDX-1140 is a fully human agonist monoclonal antibody targeted to CD40, a key activator of immune response, which is found on dendritic cells, macrophages and B cells and is also expressed on many cancer cells. Potent CD40 agonist antibodies have shown encouraging results in early clinical studies; however, systemic toxicity associated with broad CD40 activation has limited their dosing. CDX-1140 has unique properties relative to other CD40 agonist antibodies: potent agonist activity is independent of Fc receptor interaction, contributing to more consistent, controlled immune activation; CD40L binding is not blocked, leading to potential synergistic effects of agonist activity near activated T cells in lymph nodes and tumors; and the antibody does not promote cytokine production in whole blood assays. CDX-1140 has shown direct anti-tumor activity in preclinical models of lymphoma. Preclinical studies of CDX-1140 clearly demonstrate strong immune activation effects and low systemic toxicity and support the design of the Phase 1 study to identify the dose for characterizing single-agent and combination activity.

We initiated a Phase 1 study of CDX-1140 in November 2017. This study is expected to enroll up to approximately 180 patients with recurrent, locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors and B cell lymphomas. The study is designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose, or MTD, during a dose-escalation phase (0.01 to 3.0 mg/kg once every four weeks until confirmed progression or intolerance) and to recommend a dose level for further study in a subsequent expansion phase. The expansion is designed to further evaluate the tolerability and biologic effects of selected dose(s) of CDX-1140 in specific tumor types. Secondary objectives include assessments of safety and tolerability, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and additional measures of anti-tumor activity, including clinical benefit rate. We believe that the potential for CDX-1140 will be best defined in combination studies with other immunotherapies or conventional cancer treatments.

In support of this, the Phase 1 study protocol also allows for the exploration of CDX-1140 in combination with CDX-301 at a fixed dose of CDX-301 and escalating doses of CDX-1140. Dendritic cells, which express CD40, are often rare or missing from the tumor microenvironment and are critical for initiating anti-tumor immunity. CDX-301 is being utilized to increase the number of dendritic cells in blood and tissue available for CDX-1140 activation. CDX-1140 should, in turn, activate and mature the dendritic cells, an important step for enhancing anti-tumor immune responses.

Interim data from the Phase 1 study were presented in April 2019 at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting. 30 patients were enrolled in the study at the time of data analysis (n=22 monotherapy; n=8 combination). Six monotherapy dosing cohorts in both solid tumors and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (0.01, 0.03, 0.09, 0.18, 0.36 and 0.72 mg/kg) and two combination cohorts in solid tumors (0.09 and 0.18 mg/kg) with CDX-301 were completed. Enrollment to the seventh monotherapy cohort at 1.5 mg/kg and to the third CDX-301 combination cohort at 0.36 mg/kg were ongoing. In general, patients had advanced disease and were heavily pretreated (median number of prior therapies: 4 monotherapy arm; 3.5 combination arm). CDX-1140 was generally well tolerated. An MTD had not been reached. Three patients experienced serious treatment related adverse events (pneumonitis and hypoxia; possible cytokine release, fatigue and fever; and, fatigue and nausea). Across both arms of the study, there were no high grade (Grade 3 or above) drug-related changes observed in liver function tests or platelets, including at CDX-1140 dose levels which exceed the MTDs or recommended Phase 2 dose reported with other CD40 agonists. The addition of CDX-301 did not affect the tolerability of CDX-1140 at the dose levels tested. Dose dependent biological effects consistent with CD40-mediated immune activation were reported. Higher dose levels achieved circulating antibody concentrations in the range of 20 to 30 micrograms

18

Table of Contents

CDX-1140 per milliliter. Transient dose-dependent pharmacodynamic effects were observed including activation of dendritic cells and B cells, along with increases in pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the blood, all of which are consistent with CD40-mediated immune activation and the hypothesis that CDX-1140 is achieving dose levels optimal for systemic exposure. The addition of CDX-301 further enhanced cytokine responses. While not anticipated at low CDX-1140 dose levels, stable disease was observed in this heavily pretreated population.

Continued enrollment is ongoing to define the MTD and select a dose for disease-specific expansion cohorts that will be monitored for clinical activity. Future combination opportunities are also being considered, including with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors, chemotherapy, radiation therapy and Celldex’s potent CD27 agonist monoclonal antibody varlilumab. Several B cell lymphomas, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma, also express both CD40 and CD27. Celldex’s varlilumab is a potent CD27 agonist and has been shown to synergize with CDX-1140 in NHL models. We plan to present updated data from the Phase 1 study at a future medical meeting in 2019.

CDX-3379

CDX-3379 is a human monoclonal antibody with half-life extension designed to block the activity of ErbB3 (HER3). We believe ErbB3 may be an important receptor regulating cancer cell growth and survival as well as resistance to targeted therapies and is expressed in many cancers, including head and neck, thyroid, breast, lung and gastric cancers, as well as melanoma. We believe the proposed mechanism of action for CDX-3379 sets it apart from other drugs in development in this class due to its ability to block both ligand-independent and ligand-dependent ErbB3 signaling by binding to a unique epitope. It has a favorable pharmacologic profile, including a longer half-life and slower clearance relative to other drug candidates in this class. We believe CDX-3379 also has potential to enhance anti-tumor activity and/or overcome resistance in combination with other targeted and cytotoxic therapies to directly kill tumor cells. Tumor cell death and the ensuing release of new tumor antigens has the potential to serve as a focus for combination therapy with immuno-oncology approaches, even in refractory patients. CDX-3379 has been evaluated in three Phase 1 studies for the treatment of multiple solid tumors that express ErbB3 and is currently being evaluated in a Phase 2 study in combination with Erbitux in Erbitux-resistant, advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSSC).

A Phase 1a/1b study of CDX-3379 was conducted in solid tumors. The study included a single-agent, dose-escalation portion and combination expansion cohorts. The single-agent, dose-escalation portion of the study did not identify an MTD, and there were no dose limiting toxicities. Four combination arms across multiple tumor types were added to evaluate CDX-3379 with several drugs that target EGFR, HER2 or BRAF. They include combinations with Erbitux® (n=16), Tarceva® (n=8), Zelboraf® (n=9) and Herceptin® (n=10). Patients had advanced disease and were generally heavily pretreated. Across the combination arms, the most frequent adverse events were diarrhea, nausea, rash and fatigue. Objective responses were observed in the Erbitux and Zelboraf combination arms. In the Erbitux arm, there was one durable complete response in a patient with head and neck cancer, who had been previously treated with Erbitux and was refractory. In the Zelboraf arm, there were two partial responses in patients who had lung cancer, one of whom had been previously treated with Tafinlar® and was considered refractory, as well as an unconfirmed partial response in a patient with thyroid cancer. Initial data were presented at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting.

In April 2018, results from a window-of-opportunity study evaluating the effect of CDX-3379 on potential biomarkers in patients with HNSCC were presented at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting. The study enrolled 12 patients with newly diagnosed HNSCC who received two doses of CDX-3379, at a two-week interval prior to tumor resection. CDX-3379 reduced phosphorylated ErbB3 (pErbB3) levels in 83% (10/12) of patient samples, with greater than or equal to 50% decreases in 58% of patients (7/12), which met the primary study objective. Stable disease was observed in 92% (11/12) of patients prior to surgery, and a patient with HPV-negative disease experienced an exceptional response (greater than 92% tumor shrinkage). CDX-3379 was well-tolerated, and no treatment-related adverse events were observed.

Preclinical data from the combination of CDX-3379 and Erbitux in xenograft models of HNSCC were also presented at the AACR Annual Meeting in April 2018. Combining CDX-3379 and Erbitux inhibited tumor growth more potently than Erbitux alone. Mechanistic studies demonstrated a reduction of PD-L1 expression from the combination.

We initiated an open-label Phase 2 study in combination with Erbitux in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV) negative, Erbitux-resistant, advanced HNSCC who have previously been treated with an anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor, a population with limited options and a particularly poor prognosis. We opened the study to enrollment in November 2017. The study was initially designed as a Simon two-stage design with an interim futility analysis following enrollment of the first 13 patients. According to the study design, if at least one patient achieved an objective response in the first stage, enrollment could progress to the second stage. The primary endpoint of the study is objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints include assessments of clinical benefit response (CBR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety and pharmacokinetics associated with the combination. Enrollment to the first stage of the Phase 2 study (n=15) is complete and interim data from the study were presented at the 2019 ASCO Annual Meeting in June that support the continued development of CDX-3379.

19

Table of Contents

Patients had a median of 3 (range of 2-6) prior cancer therapy treatments. All patients had received prior checkpoint inhibitor treatment and 14 of 15 patients were cetuximab refractory. Notable clinical activity was observed in this refractory patient population. A durable confirmed complete response (11+ months) was observed; this response remains ongoing and the patient continues to receive treatment. An unconfirmed partial response (uPR) in a patient that had not received cetuximab was also observed. 7 patients experienced stable disease (47%; includes uPR). A clinical benefit rate of 29% was achieved (objective response or stable disease greater than or equal to 12 weeks). CDX-3379 in combination with cetuximab was generally associated with the expected target-mediated adverse events of diarrhea and rash.

Emerging data from the Phase 2 study and earlier studies of CDX-3379 suggest that antitumor activity may be associated with somatic mutations in certain genes. Based on these observations, next-generation sequencing was performed on tumor samples from 18 patients with HNSCC treated with CDX-3379 across three clinical studies of CDX-3379 that have enrolled patients with HNSCC. This data set included four patients with clinical responses, eight patients with stable disease and/or tumor shrinkage, and six patients with progressive disease. Key findings are outlined below.

·                  All four clinical responses occurred in patients with mutations in the FAT1 gene.

·                  All four clinical responses occurred in patients with a primary tumor site of oral cavity.

·                  Three of the four clinical responses occurred in patients who also had mutations in NOTCH1, NOTCH2 or NOTCH3 genes.

·                  Also, of note, all patients (n=7 of 18) who experienced clinical benefit (objective response or stable disease greater than or equal to 12 weeks) had FAT1 and/or NOTCH1-3 mutations.

·                  FAT1 and NOTCH genes are associated with tumor suppression. Inactivating mutations in the FAT1 and NOTCH genes occur in sizeable subsets of HPV negative HNSCC tumors, having been identified in 32% (FAT1) and 26% (NOTCH) of these tumors, respectively. Preclinical studies investigating the association of CDX-3379 sensitivity and inactivating mutations of FAT1 and other genes are ongoing.

Based on these biomarker observations and the notable clinical activity observed in this refractory patient population, the study has been expanded (n= ~45 patients, including at least 15 patients with FAT1 mutations) to allow for an evaluation of the utility of biomarkers for future patient selection. Enrollment is ongoing.

CDX-0159

CDX-0159 is a humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically binds the KIT receptor and potently inhibits its activity. The KIT receptor tyrosine kinase is expressed in a variety of cells, including mast cells, and its activation by its ligand SCF regulates mast cell growth, differentiation, survival, chemotaxis and degranulation. In certain inflammatory diseases, such as chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU), mast cell degranulation plays a central role in the onset and progression of the disease.

CDX-0159 is a re-engineered variant of CDX-0158, which was specifically designed to block KIT activation by disrupting both SCF binding and KIT dimerization. Preclinical and clinical data with CDX-0158 demonstrated robust inhibition of mast cell activity and decreased mast cell numbers, supporting the concept that targeting KIT can modulate mast cell activity and potentially provide clinical benefit in mast cell related diseases. CDX-0159 was re-designed to ablate Fc receptor interactions and effector function and improve its safety profile, while preserving full KIT inhibitory activity. In addition, CDX-0159 was modified to provide extended half-life following administration.

We plan to submit an Investigational New Drug (IND) Application and initiate a Phase 1a study of CDX-0159 by year end 2019. The study is designed to evaluate the safety profile, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single ascending doses of CDX-0159 in healthy subjects. Following completion of this study, we plan to further study CDX-0159 in CIU, a mast cell-related disease. CIU presents as itchy hives, angioedema or both for at least six weeks without a specific trigger; multiple episodes can play out over years or even decades. About 50% of patients with CIU achieve symptomatic control with antihistamines or leukotriene receptor antagonists. Omalizumab, an IgE inhibitor, provides relief for roughly half of the remaining antihistamine/leukotriene refractory patients. Consequently, there is a need for more effective later line therapies.

Varlilumab

Varlilumab is a fully human agonist monoclonal antibody that binds to and activates CD27, a critical co-stimulatory molecule in the immune activation cascade. We believe varlilumab works primarily by stimulating T cells, an important component of a person’s immune system, to attack cancer cells. Restricted expression and regulation of CD27 enables varlilumab specifically to activate T cells, resulting in an enhanced immune response with the potential for a favorable safety profile. In preclinical studies, varlilumab has been shown to directly kill or inhibit the growth of CD27 expressing lymphomas and leukemias in in vitro and in vivo models. Varlilumab was initially studied as a single-agent to establish a safety profile and assess immunologic and clinical activity in

20

Table of Contents